Return to topic
home <--> Return to
Support HomeCopyright © 2011
ISIS International Species Information System
KnowledgeBase (KB) Archived MedARKS Topic
** THE FOLLOWING KB TOPIC SHOULD BE TREATED AS LEGACY INFORMATION **
** THESE TOPICS ARE NOT ACTIVELY UPDATED BY ISIS **
** THE INFORMATION FOUND IN THESE TOPICS SHOULD BE USED WITH CAUTION **
Using Abbreviations in your MedARKS Records:
BAR, CTM, ADR, kpr, D/C, QAR, FB, NPS, OS, QNS, mm pi
How many of the above abbreviations do you recognize? All were extracted from MedARKS records contributed by a number of institutions from across the U.S.A. How many do you think are universal enough that a colleague in Europe or Australia would also recognize and understand these entries in a medical record?
Like many of the sciences, veterinary medicine has developed a specialty language that abounds with acronyms and abbreviations. Some of these abbreviations, derived from Latin origins or carried over from the human medical field, are virtually universal and can be safely used within veterinary medical records (e.g., b.i.d., p.o., s.i.d.). Other acronyms (e.g., ADR) are much more regional and may be unfamiliar to someone working even in a different part of the same country. Most abbreviations or acronyms were developed to save time when writing paper records and have carried over, almost as a habit, when we switched to computerized records. In an age when a record search meant that you opened a file cabinet drawer and read every record to locate those that were of interest, the use of abbreviations made no difference to this process. However, with automated text searches possible in a computerized record system, the use of abbreviations may complicate the planning or execution of an automated search. Abbreviations that are universally understood in veterinary medicine are acceptable in computerized records and abbreviations may be required in some parts of a computerized record due to space limitations, but otherwise, you should think carefully about the use of any abbreviations within your MedARKS records. MedARKS provides you with a number of tools that allow you to avoid using many abbreviations without sacrificing data entry speed, so the excuse that abbreviations save time is often no longer valid.
Particularly strange is the use of abbreviations within user-defined lists. Examples of lists that the user can define include the routinely used laboratories in the hematology & blood chemistry module, the list of purposes in the parasitology module and the list of carcass dispositions in the pathology module. During data entry, you are choosing from this list of predefined choices and it takes exactly the same amount of time and effort to choose either a short entry or a long entry from that list. So, whether the list entry says "M.P.M." or "Milwaukee Public Museum", makes no difference during data entry, but the latter entry is clearly more useful in terms of the information content. Even entries like "Zoo" or "In-house" are usually inappropriate (these entries only make sense within the context of the institution where they were written). When you are creating entries for a data entry list, keep in mind that someone several thousand miles from the present institution may someday examine records containing that information. Look at the entries that you have defined and simply ask whether those entries would make any sense to that person. If the answer is negative, then think about changing the entries on the list to maximize the information content. Remember that there is no data entry penalty for having complete entries on the user-defined lists, but abbreviations can penalize everyone else by diminishing the value of your records when those records are shared with other institutions.
Benefits derived from avoidance of abbreviations and acronyms:
1. Improved record retrieval: Searching records for a particular piece of information can be more difficult when the information is present in abbreviated form. Abbreviations may cause unexpected matches in a computerized search. For example, if you are in the habit of using "ADR" in your records, and then decide to search for all records where you have made this entry, you could also retrieve all records containing such words as adrenal, quadriceps, quadrant and Benadryl. Your job of examining those records containing "ADR" has been complicated by the task of discarding the false matches produced by using this particular abbreviation.
The retrieval problem becomes more severe when you use abbreviations inconsistently. Imagine that you want to examine all the records where there was a problem with the left eye. Could you simply search your records for "left eye" or would you need to search for "left eye", "lt eye", "lt. eye", "o.s." and "os"? Clearly, the latter search is more complex to perform and the "os" entry will complicate the results by yielding many false positive matches. Either avoiding abbreviations (always enter "left eye") or always using the proper abbreviation ("o.s.") would make your record search both easier and more productive.
2. Sharing information with meaningful content: Abbreviations that make sense within your institution can quickly become useless once that information is shared with another institution (information sharing happens every time you include a diskette of MedARKS records along with an animal being shipped to another institution). As an example, consider just the laboratory information in the clinical pathology (hematology and blood chemistry) records. It is (unfortunately) a common practice to severely abbreviate these entries. Within an institution, the laboratory abbreviated "M.S.D.L." will probably have some meaning, but send that record elsewhere and the next institution is left wondering if that work was done at the "Michigan State Diagnostic Laboratory", the "Minnesota State Diagnostic Laboratory", or somewhere else entirely.
So, now you are convinced that abbreviations should be avoided, but how do you fix the existing records?
The first step to improving your records is to start avoiding abbreviations whenever possible and to think carefully about data consistency and record retrieval for those abbreviations that you do use. MedARKS gives you a number of options to allow you to discontinue the use of many abbreviations without sacrificing any data entry speed. Edit the user-defined lists in every module to maximize the information in the space that is allocated. Edit the standard text and forms entries to include the full text of your favorite acronyms, so that a few keystrokes will allow you to insert "Bright, alert and responsive" into the record in place of "BAR" or "Continue treatment and medications" instead of "CTM".
Editing the existing records may sound like an impossible task, but included in MedARKS are a number of data quality routines that can be used to fix exactly the kinds of data problems that are being discussed (see Helpful Hint #16). Every MedARKS record module has one or more data quality routines and many of these routines are "search and replace" routines that are designed to search your records for a particular entry and allow you to replace it with another entry. Most of the data quality routines are located on the module utility menu. Browse through the utility menu of each record module to see what data quality options are available. However, use these powerful tools with care - changing all your "lt eye" entries to "left eye" is just as easy as changing them all to "right eye", but the latter editing change will be detrimental to your records.
Translation of ‘common’ abbreviations listed at the beginning of this page:
BAR = bright, alert and responsive
CTM = continue treatment and medication
ADR = Ain't doing right
kpr = keeper
D/C = discontinue
QAR = quiet, alert and responsive
FB = foreign body
NPS = No parasites seen
OS = left eye
QNS = quantity not sufficient (for analysis)
mm pi = mucous membranes pink
written by J. Andrew Teare, DVM
Last update: 2.Nov.1998
Return to topic
home <--> Return to
Support HomeCopyright © 2011
ISIS International Species Information System